Recent
International Developments in Saving the Ozone Layer
191 Countries
Agree to Strengthen Protection of the Earth's Ozone Layer
At the 19th Meeting of the
Parties in Montreal on September 17-21, 2007, the Parties agreed to more
aggressively phase out ozone-depleting hydrochlorofluorocarbons (HCFCs). The
final agreement resulted from discussion of six proposals submitted by
governments from both developed and developing countries - Argentina and Brazil;
Norway, Iceland and Switzerland; the United States; Mauritania; Mauritius; and
the Federated States of Micronesia.
HCFCs originally emerged as
replacement chemicals for use in air conditioning, some forms of refrigeration
equipment and foams.
HCFC reductions
for the U.S., reflecting the agreement at the 19th Meeting in Montreal
HCFC
Phaseout Schedule
All developed (i.e., non-Article 5)
countries that are Parties to the Montreal Protocol are subject to caps on their
consumption and production of hydrochlorofluorocarbons (HCFCs).
Consumption is calculated by the following
formula: consumption = production plus imports minus exports. The cap is set at
2.8% of that country's 1989 chlorofluorocarbon consumption + 100% of that
country's 1989 HCFC consumption. The cap on production is set at the average of
a) 1989 HCFC production + 2.8% of 1989 CFC production and b) 1989 HCFC
consumption + 2.8% of 1989 CFC consumption. (Quantities of chemicals measured
under the cap are ODP-weighted, which means that each chemical's relative
contribution to ozone depletion is taken into account.)
Under the Montreal Protocol, the U.S. and
other developed nations are obligated to achieve a certain percentage of
progress towards the total phaseout of HCFCs, by certain dates. These nations
use the cap as a baseline to measure their progress towards achieving these
percentage goals.
The following table shows the U.S.
schedule for phasing out its use of HCFCs in accordance with the terms of the
Protocol. The Agency intends to meet the limits set under the Protocol by
accelerating the phaseout of HCFC-141b, HCFC-142b and HCFC-22. These are the
most damaging of the HCFCs. By eliminating these chemicals by the specified
dates, the Agency believes that it will meet the requirements set by the Parties
to the Protocol. The Agency is also committed to the phaseout of all HCFCs. The
third and fourth columns of the table show how the U.S. will meet the
international obligations described in the first two columns. The HCFCs to be
phased out according to the schedule in the table below include HCFC-22,
HCFC-123, HCFC-124, HCFC-133a, HCFC-141b, HCFC-142b, HCFC-225ca and HCFC-225cb.
Comparison of the Montreal
Protocol and United States Phaseout Schedules
| Montreal
Protocol |
United
States |
| Year to be
Implemented |
% Reduction in
Consumption and Production Using
the Cap as a Baseline |
Year
to be Implemented |
Implementation of
HCFC Phaseout through Clean Air Act Regulations |
| 2004 |
35.0% |
2003 |
No production and no importing of
HCFC-141b |
| 2010 |
75.0%
65%
|
2010 |
No production and no importing of
HCFC-142b and HCFC-22, except for use in equipment manufactured before
1/1/2010 (so no production or importing for NEW equipment that uses
these refrigerants) |
| 2015² |
90.0% |
2015 |
No production and no importing of
any HCFCs, except for use as refrigerants in equipment manufactured
before 1/1/2020 |
| 2020 |
99.5%³ |
2020 |
No production and no importing of
HCFC-142b and HCFC-22 |
| 2030 |
100.0% |
2030 |
No production and no importing of
any HCFCs |
¹ Adjustments to the HCFC phaseout schedule agreed at
the 19th Meeting of the Parties to the Montreal Protocol, September 2007.
² The Parties agreed to address the possibilities or
need for essential use exemptions, no later than 2015.
³ The Parties agreed to review in 2015 the need for
the 0.5 per cent production or import for servicing during the period 2020-2030.
Environmental
Benefits of the New, Stronger HCFC Phaseout Agreement
The agreement to
adjust the phase-out schedule for HCFCs is expected to reduce emissions of HCFCs
to the atmosphere by 47 percent, compared to the prior commitments under the
treaty over the 30-year period of 2010 to 2040. For the developing countries,
the agreement means there will be about a 58 percent reduction in HCFCs emission
over the 30 year period.
The HCFC
reductions in developing countries, reflecting the agreement at the 19th Meeting
in Montreal

The climate benefits of the
stronger HCFC agreement will depend on technology choices of the transition from
HCFCs during the 30 year time frame of the HCFC phase out. The estimated climate
benefit of the new, stronger HCFC phase out may be as much as 9,000 million
metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent (MMTCO 2-eq), or the equivalent of
removing the climate emissions from 70 million U.S. passenger cars each year,
for the next 30 years. This means the new, stronger HCFC agreement is equivalent
to eliminating the climate emissions from 50 percent of all U.S. passenger cars
each year, for the next 30 years.
Another way of explaining the
climate benefit of the new, stronger HCFC phaseout agreement is to say it is
equivalent to eliminating the climate emissions from the electricity needed by
40 million U.S. households each year, for the next 30 years, which would be eliminating
the climate emissions from the electricity needed by 40 percent of U.S.
households each year, for the next 30 years.
Analysis –
Overall HCFC Agreement
POTENTIAL CLIMATE BENEFITS OF NEW
STRONGER HCFC PHASEOUT CONTROLS
|
A Transition from HCFCs to
Currently Available Substitute Technologies (often using other high
global warming gases) † |
Mid Point |
A Transition from HCFCs to No- or
Low-GWP Substitute Technologies † |
| Reduction in MMTCE (million metric
tonnes carbon equivalent) [CO2-eqivalent] |
750 [2,750] |
2,575 [9,442] |
4,370 [16,023] |
| US passenger cars off the road each
year for next 30 years ª * |
|
68,100,000 |
|
| Percentage of US fleet of passenger
cars taken off the road each year, for the next 30 years |
|
53% |
|
| US households not using electricity
for each year over the next 30 years ª ** |
|
40,400,000 |
|
| Percentage of US households not
using any electricity for a year, for the next 30 years |
|
38% |
|
† Calculations from the USEPA analysis
of HCFC Consumption and Emissions arising from U.S. adjustment proposal for HCFC
phaseout and the transition to substitute technologies, report developed by ICF
International (ICF 2007)
ª Calculations taken from the US Climate
Technology Cooperation Gateway website that is sponsored by USEPA and USAID.
(soon to be updated)
* Number of passenger cars in the States
is based on 127.7 million registered vehicles in 2001 with average gas mileage
of 23.9 mpg and the calculated CO2 emitted per gallon of gasoline burned of
8.781 kg (soon to be updated with new "gateway")
** Number of households and energy use is
based on 105.2 million households in 2000 from USDOE's publication "2002
Buildings Energy Databook" with a national average CO2 output of 1,392
pounds per megawatt-hour (soon to be updated with "gateway")
Historical Background
This agreement coincides with the 20th anniversary of the signing of the
Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer, widely considered
one of the most successful international environmental treaties to date.
September 16, 2007, marked the 20th anniversary of the signing of the Montreal
Protocol, the agreement to restore the ozone layer and protect future
generations from the harmful effects of ultraviolet (UV) radiation.
Twenty years ago, 24 nations
signed the ambitious treaty to reduce production of substances responsible for
ozone layer depletion, such as chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) in aerosol sprays and
in refrigeration products. Today, 191 countries – virtually every country in
the world - have signed the Montreal Protocol, and each country has measurable
goals and actions for achieving success.
The depletion of the ozone layer
contributes to an increased amount of UV radiation reaching the Earth's surface.
Overexposure to UV radiation causes a wide range of health problems for humans,
especially skin cancer, as well as other ecological and economic impacts. A
future with a repaired ozone layer is a future where skin cancer will be less
prevalent.
HCFC phaseout
in the U.S.
Class II controlled substances
have an ozone depletion potential (ODP) less than 0.2 and are subject to a later
phaseout schedule than Class I substances. Class II substances are all
hydrochlorofluorocarbons (HCFCs), which were developed as transitional
substitutes for Class I substances and which have many of the same uses as CFCs.
Of the 34 HCFCs, the most widely
used have been HCFC-22 (a commercial refrigerant), HCFC-141b (a solvent and
foam-blowing agent), and HCFC-142b (a foam-blowing agent and component in
refrigerant blends).
Section 605 of the Clean Air Act
sets the phaseout targets for Class II substances.
At the 19th Meeting of the
Parties in Montreal on September 17-21, 2007, the Parties agreed to a more
aggressive phasedown of HCFCs in both developing and developed countries. The
overall schedule for the HCFC phaseout in the U.S. remains the same, and
includes the following milestones:
- On January 1, 2003, EPA banned
the production and import of virgin HCFC-141b, the first Class II substance
to be phased out.
- On January 1, 2010, production
and import of virgin HCFC-22 and HCFC-142b will be banned. Exceptions
will be available for servicing of equipment made before this date (the
so-called “servicing tail”), for export, and for processes resulting in
transformation or destruction of the substances.
- On January 1, 2015, production
and import of other virgin Class II substances will be banned.
Exceptions will be available for use as a refrigerant in equipment
manufactured before January 1, 2020, as well as for export and for processes
resulting in transformation or destruction.
- On January 1, 2020, all
production and import of virgin HCFC-22 and HCFC-142 will be banned, with
exceptions for export and for processes resulting in transformation or
destruction.
- On January 1, 2030, all
production and import of virgin HCFCs will be banned, with exceptions for
export and processes resulting in transformation or destruction.
- On January 1, 2040, all
production and import of virgin HCFCs will be banned, except for processes
resulting in transformation or destruction.
Accomplishments from the 19th
Meeting of the Parties in Montreal, Canada
President George W. Bush stated the following about the HCFC phaseout agreement
in his remarks at the U.S. Department of State on September 28, 2007:
“We have confidence in the
success of our efforts. Twenty years ago, nations finalized an agreement called
the Montreal Protocol to phase out substances that were depleting the ozone
layer. Since then, we have made great strides to repair the damage. Just last
week, developed and developing nations reached consensus on speeding up the
recovery of the ozone layer by accelerating the phase-out of these harmful
substances. This accelerated phase-out will bring larger benefits because
they'll dramatically reduce greenhouse gas emissions.”
EPA Administrator Stephen L.
Johnson delivered the high-level intervention on behalf of the United States at
the 19th Meeting of the Parties in Montreal, Canada, in which he strongly
encouraged the Parties to more aggressively phase out HCFCs.

Stephen L.
Johnson EPA Administrator
09/17/2007
Administrator Johnson, 19th Meeting of the Parties to the Montreal Protocol on
Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer, Montreal, Canada
Thank you, Mr. President.
On behalf of the United States of
America, I wish to express our sincerest appreciation to the government and
people of Canada for hosting the 20th Anniversary Celebration of the Montreal
Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer on this occasion of the 19th
Meeting of the Parties.
I appreciate Canada's ongoing
commitment to our common effort to protect the Earth’s ozone layer.
Twenty years ago, the community
of nations came together to adopt a strategy for the global challenge of ozone
depletion. Today, the United States of America joins our international partners
in celebrating the anniversary of the Montreal Protocol – a shining example of
how human ingenuity, leadership and determination can create a healthier, better
world.
As Administrator of the U.S. EPA,
it is a personal privilege to be here to join in this commemoration. Not only am
I proud to follow in the footsteps of the visionary leaders responsible for our
successes – including several of my predecessors – I am proud to represent
the hundreds of dedicated members of the EPA team, who were influential in
fostering this international agreement.
However, this international
effort is far from over.
While yesterday’s presentations
highlighted the Montreal Protocol’s progress in addressing the global threat,
they also underscored how far we still need to go to see a complete recovery of
our Earth’s stratospheric ozone layer.
To this end, the U.S. has
submitted a package of proposed adjustments to the Montreal Protocol to be
considered at this Meeting of the Parties, which calls on the global community
to act more quickly in completing the HCFC phase-out. In doing so, we are
fulfilling our commitment from last June’s G8 Summit Declaration to accelerate
the phase out of HCFCs in a way that supports energy efficiency and climate
change objectives.
The U.S. believes the Parties
have an important opportunity this week to agree on adjustments that will
advance ozone recovery several years and also produce climate change benefits
that are potentially greater than the reductions experienced under Kyoto
(depending on the transition and development of new technologies and
substitutes).
In moving faster to heal the
ozone layer, we can write the next chapter in the Montreal Protocol’s success
story by helping prevent skin cancer caused by excess UV radiation exposure. As
supporters of this effort, the U.S. encourages all delegates to strive to reach
an agreement at this meeting that will accelerate HCFC control measures,
demonstrating our continued commitment to finding cost-effective ways to promote
a more rapid recovery for the ozone layer.
In addition, we challenge all
delegations to consider ways of destroying the banks of ozone-depleting
substances currently installed in equipment. These large sources of CFCs and
other ozone-depleting substances represent a ripe opportunity to both further
protect the ozone layer and to reduce emissions that contribute to global
climate change.
And finally, as the work changes,
we hope delegations continue to pursue pragmatic approaches to help the
institutions of the Montreal Protocol evolve.
As always, at the heart of
solving any global environmental challenge is a commitment to sound science. And
of course, this was the case with addressing the challenge of ozone depletion.
As a career scientist at the U.S. EPA, I sometimes wonder where we would be
without the discoveries by Molina and Rowland, whose efforts – and the efforts
of many other scientists – have helped pave the way in saving the lives of
millions of people throughout our world.
I appreciate the investments of
institutions such as the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and the
National Aeronautics and Space Administration, whose influential contributions
provided the science necessary for the world’s policymakers to take action.
Altogether, we estimate the U.S. contribution to scientific monitoring, modeling
and analysis activities has been in excess of $50 million since 1980. In
addition to the financial investments, we owe a debt of gratitude to the
committed scientists and professionals at NASA and NOAA – and other scientific
institutions around the world – who have helped us meet this global challenge.
Once again, it is an honor to
represent the United States during this historic anniversary. Working together
with the leaders of the international community, we are continuing to create a
better tomorrow by protecting the Earth's atmosphere today.
Thank you.
Credit -United States EPA
|